Dubai (UAE)
Nicosia (Cyprus)
St. Petersburg
The actual address

Moscow, st. Malaya Polyanka, d. 12A
(near metro Polyanka)

Our specialists have an experience in the following fields

Corporate practice

Conversion of loan into the authorized capital in the amount of more than 850 million rubles.

Support of transaction on Loan Agreement claims right conversion into the authorized capital of the Russian company in the amount of more than 850 million rubles. Within the project all necessary corporate procedures and registration acts were performed in the Russian state authorities. Simultaneously one of the Russian foreign debtors was liquidated with the transfer of its rights to the successor. As a result the client increased its share in the Russian company.

Field: Aviation

View all fields

Consultation on merger into joint venture and Corporate Agreement conclusion.

Consultation for the client on merger into joint venture and financing of business project in the amount of 1.8 million US dollars with the following conversion of loans into the authorized capital. The lawyers of the company participated in development of Shareholder Agreement between the client (new shareholder) and its founder (current owner). The Agreement regulates the terms of shareholders participation in the project, company management, terms and forms of additional financing of the company and client departure from the project.

Field: Energy and natural resources

Successful client defense in the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

Representation of client interests (public joint-stock company) in the Central Bank of the Russian Federation during administrative proceedings regarding violation by the company of annual general meeting convening and holding rules. Finally regulator issued a warning instead of penalty in the amount of 500 000 - 700 000 rubles.

Field: Industrial production and distribution

Development of corporate management structure for construction holding.

Client construction business was based on several companies pertaining to different people. Each such company had its own management system. Client task was to improve the system of corporate management.

As a result several types of holding companies management structure were developed. These variants do not require the change of holders but make it possible for the Beneficial owner to effect control over holding companies decision making.

Field: Immovable property, construction, development

Formation of joint venture by Russian and foreign partners.

Consultation for a client on joint venture formation with its foreign partner, on product distribution and consequent nationalization of products in Russia.

Lawyers prepared detailed plan of joint venture formation. There were defined necessary corporate actions of foreign partner and offered options of management structure, which included the cooperation of two directors, presenting both parts of business. The lawyers defined variant of foreign partner trademark usage by the joint venture and of other intellectual property items usage; terms of Corporate Agreement which include joint company management and appointment of the key managers by each partner as well as the term of non-competition between the partners on the Russian market.

The Russian partners of the joint venture were individuals consequently it was necessary to provide recommendations on matrimonial relationships and succession.

Field: Industrial production and distribution

Corporate Agreement for regional auto parts stores chain.

The formation of Corporate Agreement between the founders of venture and new investors. The lawyers took into account the investors obligations of additional financing of the company, of obtaining by them the share in the authorized capital of the venture; requirements to the financial data regarding company activity, to the management structure and investors control over venture activity. Moreover there was singled out that it is possible to sell the venture by all its members to the external investor.

Field: Trade and commerce

Consultation on joint venture formation and variants of additional venture capitalization.

Consultation for joint venture on variants of primary and additional financing (additional capitalization) of the company by the members and external investors. Simultaneously there were given recommendations on the terms of the Corporate Agreement between members of the company.

Field: Banks, financial institutions, investment, insurance

Consultation on change of operational control over pharmaceutical company activity.

The client was one of the shareholders of the Russian pharmaceutical company and intended to consolidate significant stock of company shares.

The lawyers developed detailed plan of duties and company documentation acceptance from the head, information receipt, verification of past company activity and its main management authorities; gave recommendations on violation discovery and variants of measures aimed to bring to responsibility and to compensate for company losses.

Field: Healthcare and pharmacy

Consultation on purchase of the company which is under corporate conflict.

The client was interested in buying the significant share in chemical industry venture. Nevertheless at that moment its owners stepped into corporate conflict and it was possible to purchase the share only from one owner.

The lawyers analyzed legal risks of such purchase; defined maximum level of corporate control over the venture, which the client can possess after potential transaction, second owner rights and possibilities limits regarding company management, chargeback, resolutions of new possible company management authorities, risk of possible company activity suspension as a result of corporate conflict.

Field: Industrial production

Consultation for company on shareholder requirements lawfulness concerning obligatory share redemption.

Client company and other persons purchased significant share stock of public joint-stock company. One of minority shareholders thought that it had been a merger as all buyers represented one person

(were affiliated) and it applied to court with the requirement of purchasing its shares at certain price towards the client company. In case of justifying its position the client company would face restrictions on its shares management. Part of them was not admitted to voting at the general meeting.

The lawyers managed to prove that minority shareholder requirements were not justified.

Field: Food industry

Right defense of insurance company minority shareholder.

The lawyers provided minority shareholder of one of the regional insurance company with consultation on violations made by the company during additional share issue and regarding refusal from presenting the company activity information. Prepared recommendations were used by the client during negotiations with majority shareholders.

Field: Banks, financial institutions, investment, insurance

Consultation on difficult reorganization of operating business.

Client company which provides medical services had to effect significant payment to the creditors. These acts would lead to suspension of company activity and bankruptcy; moreover most of company divisions were profitable and could pay off the debts within several years.

The client intended to reorganize the company, single out several legal entities, distribute between them the assets and parent company obligations for balanced distribution of debt load and profit centers. In addition it was important for the client not to allow bankruptcy and to prevent reorganization from affecting the current operation activity of the parent company.

The lawyers prepared reorganization plan, defined associated risks and advised how to minimize them.

Field: Healthcare and pharmacy

Legal Due Diligence of big poultry factory.

One of the biggest regional poultry ventures was verified by means of Legal Due Diligence. This verification included corporate part, immovable property as well as ecology and environment protection. Simultaneously one of the companies from Big Four performed financial verification of this company.

Field: Agricultural sector

Consultation on joint venture formation (meat-processing plant) and creation of Corporate Agreement (Shareholder Agreement).

The lawyers provided future owners of the joint venture with consultation and prepared Corporate Agreement. There were defined necessary each partner actions aimed at new venture formation, ownership interest in business, joint and individual actions regarding business promotion, action plan in different situations and voting rules at the general meetings, procedure and terms of leaving the project as well as responsibility for Agreement violation.

Interests representation in corporate conflict between the owners of audit company.

Consultation for one of the biggest regional audit companies on corporate conflict with the successors of one of the owners. The lawyers represented interests of the company and of its Head during judicial dispute on successors lawsuit with respect to money collection for previous company activity. In the end of judicial dispute this suit was dismissed.

Field: Consulting

Corporate Agreement for health clinic of dialysis centers.

Foreign shareholder transferred as a bonus part of its shares to the Head of its Russian venture for ensuring work effectiveness.

The lawyers created Corporate Agreement between the parties which prohibited competition on the part of new shareholder, introduced agreed shares management, terms of share repurchase by the foreign shareholder, defined questions regarding company management and responsibility for non-correspondence to Agreement conditions.

Field: Healthcare and pharmacy

Commercial Practice. Transactions and Commerce

Development of legal model and preparation of legal documents for the trade internet-platform in the sphere of B2B (marketplace)

Development of internet-platform legal model (marketplace) regarding making transactions on food wholesale activity, complex legal consultancy for the client, framing of legal documents. The service joined together suppliers, retail stores including trade chains and transport logistics companies. The transactions were effected online and the client-organizer of the marketplace controlled the process of making transactions and calculations connected with them.

Field: Trade, retail, commerce

View all fields

Legal Due Diligence of poultry factory

Legal due diligence of regional poultry enterprise (corporate subject, immovable complex, issues of ecology and environmental protection).

Field: Agroindustrial complex

Court Practice

Successful client representation in court in the case of litigating a transaction and preventing the collection in the amount of more than 1 million US dollars

The Court of Arbitrazh agreed with the opinion that disputed transaction was made corresponding to all corporate procedures; rights and interests of claimant and its shareholders were not violated and the execution was effected to the proper creditor.

Field: Industry production

View all fields

Successful court defense of the agreement on land lot lease transfer for factory building

Municipality litigated the agreement on land lot lease transfer for factory building and asked to declare the transaction invalid. In the result of proceedings the appeal was dismissed.

Field: Industry production

Client representation in court regarding debt collection and debtor property arrest

The client counteragent failed to pay on time large sum for the delivery of special transport equipment spare parts. There was a risk of money balance and debtor assets withdrawal which would make it difficult to collect money. During proceedings debtor property was imposed with a penalty. Further negotiations with the debtor led to the following: the part of debtor liquid equipment shall be transferred to the client ownership. As a result this decision helped to avoid decision litigation by the debtor and property sale by means of long tendering procedures.

Field: Trade, retail, commerce

Intellectual property practice

Defense in court regarding the case of someone else’s trademark illegal usage.

New set of goods under the trademark similar to the trademark of well-known Russian pastry factory was obtained in the client company, food retail chain. The client was not aware of this problem and the goods came in retail. Right owner effected evidentiary purchase and applied to court with the demand for damages recovery due to violation of its intellectual property rights.

As a result of judicial proceedings the amount of compensation was decreased by five times in comparison with the primary requirements.

Field: Trade and commerce

View all fields

Consultation and Agreement creation on transfer of domain name managing rights.

Consultation for the client on domain names administrator responsibility for violations made by the owners of web-sites.

Creation of legal documentation regarding transfer of domain name managing rights.

Field: IT and telecommunications

Creation of Distributor Agreement on spread of software (license).

In right owner interests there was created Distributor Agreement on spread of software license on the territory of the Russian Federation as well as Sublicense Agreement concluded between the distributor and final users.

Field: IT and telecommunications

Complex legal support of restaurants chain regarding intellectual property issues

Legal support of restaurants chain regarding intellectual property issues: framing of agreements on creation of intellectual property items (trademarks, music, interiors, food technology), registration of rights for items, framing of agreements on transfer to the third party of the rights to use the items for the purposes of business scaling.

Field: HoReCa

Labour law practice

Representation of top-manager interests in conflict with the employing company.

Top-manager of holding food industry after dismissal did not receive money payments connected with KPI and achieved financial indicators of structural subdivision headed by it. During judicial proceedings former employers were offered an amicable agreement, and it was accepted by both parties of the Employment Agreement.

Field: Food industry

View all fields

Successful interests representation of employing company on a lawsuit regarding compensation for harm to health in emergency case at workplace.

The former employee who got injured at workplace brought a suit against the venture. The employee intended to change guilt degree in emergency case and to increase payment amount which it should have received due to loss of work ability. As a result of proceedings the court delivered a judgment in favor of the client and acknowledged primary guilt degree and compensation payment amount and dismissed a suit of the former employee.

Field: Industry production

Objective reasons for staff reduction were proved in the court.

Client company performed reorganization with subsequent staff reduction. One of the dismissed employees decided to argue the fact of its reduction and applied to court requiring reemployment and money payment.

During judicial proceedings there were proved the reasons for staff reduction; justified economic uselessness of one of subdivisions and consequently confirmed no need for this subdivision existence and for its staff work. Finally lawsuit against client company was dismissed.

Field: Industry production

Do you have any questions? Please, contact us: